Web Stats for Mid-October 2007
I just took at look at some of the web stats, and the thing that continues to amaze me is how many visitors to Theocacao and Cocoa Dev Central continue to be from Windows machines.Theocacao
Operating System
-------------------------
1. Mac OS X 69.21%
2. Windows 26.11%
3. Linux 4.36%
Browser
-------------------------
1. Safari 51.31%
2. Firefox 30.30%
3. Explorer 9.47%
Browser + OS
-------------------------
1. Safari Mac 50.56%
2. Firefox Win 14.96%
3. Firefox Mac 11.73%
4. Explorer Win 9.44%
Mac Architecture
-------------------------
1. Intel 67.33%
2. PowerPC 32.67%
Cocoa Dev Central
Operating System
------------------------
1. Mac OS X 79.04%
2. Windows 18.85%
3. Linux 1.88%
Browser
------------------------
1. Safari 54.26%
2. Firefox 32.83%
3. Explorer 6.21%
Browser + OS
------------------------
1. Safari Mac 53.49%
2. Firefox Mac 20.37%
3. Firefox Win 11.27%
4. Explorer Win 6.15%
Mac Architecture
------------------------
1. Intel 69.06%
2. PowerPC 30.94%
I'm not sure where iPhone and iPod Touch show up in all of this.
Web Stats for Mid-October 2007
Posted Oct 16, 2007 — 25 comments below
Posted Oct 16, 2007 — 25 comments below
Chris L — Oct 16, 07 4745
Do you get stats for Safari on Windows? I think it is a nonstarter, a crutch for iPhone developers.
Alex Gordon — Oct 16, 07 4746
Seriously though, I can't believe all those windows users are just mac users using windows, especially on Theocacao. Maybe there's something wrong with your software (like it's not picking up the stats on certain browsers so it's defaulting to Windows). Although, the browser + OS percentages seem to add up.
And, what stats software do you use? I'd really like to get the statistics on "Mac Architecture" for my download page to know what kind of configurations people use my software for.
Scott Stevenson — Oct 16, 07 4747
Yes. It's very small.
Maybe there's something wrong with your software
Probably not. It's Google Analytics.
I can't believe all those windows users are just mac users using windows, especially on Theocacao
Actually, that makes sense to me. I'm told people read from work sometimes. The Cocoa Dev Central one is more of a mystery, since it's harder to see the value if Xcode isn't running. Maybe it's just Windows developers checking things out?
Ross — Oct 16, 07 4748
I have to put food on the table, and currently Windows (as much as it pains me) is the only way I can do that over here in the UK :(
Fbio — Oct 16, 07 4749
I like to read Mac developers' blogs because you are generally more interested in the quality of the user experience than Windows or Linux developers. I also get ideas from Cocoa and Objective-C programming that I can apply to other languages/frameworks.
Andreas Kompanez — Oct 16, 07 4750
Erik — Oct 16, 07 4751
Rick — Oct 16, 07 4752
Jose R. Vazquez — Oct 16, 07 4753
Joachim — Oct 16, 07 4755
Jeff Johnson — Oct 16, 07 4757
By the way, do you have any stats on feed readers? ;-)
Blain — Oct 16, 07 4758
That might also be why a lot of the indie mac company names sound like band names, as well as why some Devs have a sort of rock star status, except only the good parts.
kamelito — Oct 16, 07 4759
Was Oric1 user, Spectrum, C64, Amiga 500, Amiga 3000, Amiga 1200, 3DO and now windows :-(
As a QA engineer I worked on MAC projects, I never like MAC OS before OSX, it was too me inferior to what the Amiga OS was. I've seen Next machines back in the days and loved them but it was too expansive...I follow OSX since the beginning and never actually made the jump.
I'm really fed up by viruses, spyware, malware, trojan to say the least...
I'm going to buy a MAC at the end of the year or beginning 2008. Don't know yet what, a laptop or an Imac, since my kids are young, I'll probably go the laptop way and I'll leave the windows world forever (at least at home).
Kamelito
Scott Stevenson — Oct 16, 07 4760
@Joachim: I'm curious, do you have any stats on Opera?
Theocacao
Browser ----------------- 4. Camino 2.44% 5. Opera 1.59%
Cocoa Dev Central
Browser ----------------- 4. Camino 2.77% 5. Opera 2.14%
Scott Stevenson — Oct 16, 07 4761
I have multiple gigs of recent log data that I could extract it from, but I haven't added JavaScript to the feed to track it in Google Analytics. Wasn't sure how people would feel about that. It might be nice to know, though.
Blain — Oct 17, 07 4762
Scott Stevenson — Oct 17, 07 4764
It's hard to pinpoint cellphones, and nothing that I saw volunteered itself as Lynx, but here some interesting ones from Theocacao:
Operating Systems --------------------------------- PlayStation Portable 0.02% Nintendo Wii 0.01% PlayStation 3 < 0.01%
Chris L — Oct 17, 07 4765
Terry — Oct 17, 07 4766
Stuck on a PC at work with no access to a Mac until we get home.
Currently viewing from a PC with IE6.
All the best
Danny — Oct 17, 07 4767
As for the Windows-stats, well it's a Windows-world and I don't see that changing anytime soon, however sucky it gets :(
Aidan — Oct 17, 07 4768
The downside of Google Analytics is that counting stats from feed readers is tough. That's why people use things like Feedburner, or any of the various feed counting plugins for their particular blog engine.
Steve Weller — Oct 18, 07 4776
Steve Weller — Oct 18, 07 4777
Operating System ------------------------- 1. Mac OS X 79.34% 2. Windows 19.42% 3. Linux 0.95% Browser ------------------------- 1. Safari 61.40% 2. Firefox 24.53% 3. Explorer 8.99% 4. Camino 2.33% Browser + OS ------------------------- 1. Safari Mac 60.92% 2. Firefox Win 9.45% Notice these are not in order 3. Firefox Mac 14.23% 4. Explorer Win 8.94% Mac Architecture ------------------------- 1. Intel 69.20% 2. PowerPC 30.80% Windows ------------------------ XP 86.76% Vista 6.87% 2000 4.61% Server 2003 1.03% 98 0.007%
I see that Vista is now storming past Win 2000.
My numbers are very much in line with yours. There are most likely a whole bunch of people like me who are forced into the Windows thing at work.
Arden — Oct 20, 07 4791
Blain — Oct 21, 07 4806
For the record, I've often seen/done caps on Windows abbreviated. As in WIN95, WINXP, WINNT, and my fave, WINCE. But that's mostly because the DOS folders are named such.