MacBook Air as Primary Machine
John Gruber says the MacBook Air is "clearly designed as a secondary machine, not a main machine" — mainly because of the chip used and the storage capacity. I think this is true for his purposes, but there's an entire category of users that could use this not just as their primary, but their only computer.I have relatives — as I think most of us do — that mainly use their Macs for web, email, iTunes and iPhoto. All of those should run quite well on the MacBook Air. The only point that's left is installing software. Gruber says:
No optical drive. The new Remote Disc feature mitigates this limitation, at least for installing software. [...] But if you want to watch DVDs, you�re out of luck.
You're only out of luck if you can't afford the $99 Superdrive. So it can certainly be a primary machine for a certain class of user.
The thing developers need to be aware of is that the previous low-end benchmark for modern hardware was around 2.0GHz. That's now 1.6GHz, albeit with twice as much built-in memory as the base MacBook. The hard drive is also slower (pointed out by DaringFireball), which is harder to account for.
What this means is that you need to tell your bosses and/or family members that you need a MacBook Air for testing purposes to assure a good experience for your software.
(You're welcome.)
MacBook Air as Primary Machine
Posted Jan 18, 2008 — 35 comments below
Posted Jan 18, 2008 — 35 comments below
Brian Christensen — Jan 18, 08 5353
Ted — Jan 18, 08 5355
Still, I would think twice about ponying up $1800 for the MBA, if for no other reason than you just know that there will be a 160GB HD version in the very near future. Why they opted for 80GB drive over the 160GB drive, when the price difference on the two is negligible is beyond me.
For most people I've talked with, the puny hard drive is the main sticking point. The un-upgradeable RAM and battery doesn't bother too many people, but that 80GB HD seems to be the issue thats keeping most from considering it.
Brandon Walkin — Jan 18, 08 5356
My guess would be that they used the 80 GB drive because it's the highest capacity single platter 1.8" drive on the market. The 160 GB model is a double platter drive which I doubt would fit in the cramped MacBook Air enclosure.
Nicko — Jan 19, 08 5357
Now the important questions, Scott, is where is the documentation on what events are generated by that Multi-Touch track pad? The demo units at MacWorld-SF were, apparently, running 10.5.1, so why are we not seeing 'pinch' and 'rotate' listed in NSEvent.h ? I want to update my applications!
Brian Christensen — Jan 19, 08 5358
Looking at the iPod classic tech specs, the 80 GB model has a depth of 0.41" versus 0.53" for the 160 GB model. Based on this, I think it's highly unlikely that there's any room for an extra 0.12" inside the current Air enclosure.
Farhan Ahmed — Jan 19, 08 5359
But I will wait a couple months to get it; because I too feel that an update to the hard drive is coming as pointed out earlier. I could be wrong; but the worse case scenario is that I will wait a little longer.
Scott Stevenson — Jan 19, 08 5360
I don't think anything has been published yet.
Julian Schrader — Jan 19, 08 5361
And as long as you install software from the net, you won't even need the USB-Superdrive.
Jesper — Jan 19, 08 5362
If a hard disk fails after five years, it's usually because it's five years old, and to a certain limit you can't fasten that onset just by being rough with it. Not so with flash disks.
Jimmy the Geek — Jan 19, 08 5363
Scott Stevenson — Jan 19, 08 5364
A lot of people pay the same or more for a laptop in addition to their full desktop.
The boy Ken — Jan 19, 08 5365
The Flash disk will be used for virtual memory, so it'll be being hit all the time anyway.
In terms of the superdrive, there's no way I'd buy an MBA without one. How else do you install the next OS onto it (or reformat and reinstall a dodgy disk in it) - can Remote Disc be used when it won't even boot? I somehow doubt Apple put Airport / Bonjour / Remote Disc down at a level underneath the bootloader...
That said, the ability to leave the superdrive at home is good (less weight to be carrying around). If my 17" PB had a 2nd battery and an external superdrive, I'd be happy (and stronger too by now).
Peter Vidler — Jan 19, 08 5366
Jim Matthews — Jan 19, 08 5367
Actually, according to an Apple engineer who worked on it, they did. EFI can now join WiFi networks and mount a disk image or optical disk published by another machine via http. The machine with the DVD runs an app called Remote Install Assistant.
Matt — Jan 19, 08 5369
Craig S. Cottingham — Jan 19, 08 5371
An Asus Eee won't do anywhere as well for any cost, because it's not a supported platform for Mac OS X. :-)
Eric — Jan 19, 08 5372
Do you think the MacBook Air is fit for writing and compiling source code for large projects (25,000 lines) in Xcode? I really want one of these, but I am worried about the hard drive and processor speed.
Thanks so much,
Eric
Michal — Jan 19, 08 5373
Paul Franceus — Jan 19, 08 5374
Ben — Jan 19, 08 5375
@Jesper: A nice thought, but developers should give frequency disk writes zero more consideration than they do now-- there's simply no meaningful reason to do so. No user with an SSD disk will worry about whether a particular piece of software is contributing more or less to its long-term failure, and no app developer would ever be able to measure their impact on such a failure in any meaningful way, so there's no reason to spend a moment of development time worrying about it. If an SSD was really so "fragile" as to require special care in write frequency, it would never be qualified for inclusion in a mainstream consumer computer by a major manufacturer. Also, the people who are able to measure any such effects (Apple hardware qual or OS team) are the only real ones who are able to take meaningful mitigating steps, like building magic block migration into the filesystem.
Chris L — Jan 19, 08 5376
http://www.storagesearch.com/ssdmyths-endurance.html
Mike — Jan 20, 08 5377
Frank McConnell — Jan 20, 08 5378
That said, the Air is probably a win from the manufacturing and support point of view. There's only one BTO option (flash disk vs. rotating rust), one of them reduces the number of moving parts even further, and there are fewer connectors to fail.
I think we'll be seeing more computers like this in the future -- I wouldn't be surprised to see the SO-DIMM sockets disappearing from MacBooks and iMacs.
Blain — Jan 20, 08 5379
As for a primary, there's already a market of external USB optical drives, as well as usb to firewire adapters. Keep all the peripherals and monitors at home, and just carry the laptop about.
Definitely a possible primary for students. For coders, perhaps not as much because we're not exactly on the go as much.
1.6Ghz is still a lot of speed, especially given some of us still using a 1.5Ghz G4 as a dev machine. Finally, space shouldn't be an issue, as the drive should only carry the essentials; everyone keeps backups and archives on external devices or nonportable systems, right? Right?
Scot W. Stevenson — Jan 22, 08 5384
I have no idea why Apple did not introduce some form of unison on steroids with the Air. Since .Mac won't even synchronize your mail folders, let alone your documents or music, they offer no way to use two computers without a major hassle.
Y, Scot
J Nozzi — Jan 22, 08 5385
Overall, however, even in the absence of such synchronization, the MacBook Air caused me to immediately reevaluate how I actually use my MacBook Pro. I tend to be very anal about keeping everything I might possibly need or want with me at all times. Not only my files, but all my hardware, too. I have a case-within-a-case with an extra power brick, Ethernet cable, video adaptor, minijack-to-minijack cable, iPhone sync cable, USB, and firewire cable. In other words, I carry a lot of crap everywhere I go. :-)
I began rethinking that approach, however. I rarely use any of the hardware (even though it's really handy when I need it), nor even the files. By decentralizing things (and letting go of some of my digital baggage), I could probably fit.
If I could throw most of my home folder's contents into "long term storage", use the .Mac Back to my Mac feature to get at it if I really need to, I think it's a reasonable compromise. "Zen and the Art of Portable Computing", if you will. I wish I could borrow somebody's MBA for a week or two ... just to get a feel for whether or not even those fears are justified.
I would probably have already pre-ordered an Air if it weren't for two things: performance and screen size (the latter being of critical importance for someone with less-than-perfect vision).
Scott Stevenson — Jan 22, 08 5386
J Nozzi — Jan 22, 08 5387
Chris L — Jan 23, 08 5389
Blain — Jan 24, 08 5393
The one fly in my "Duo Dock reborn with USB" theory: the superdrive addon requires more juice than the USB spec; it might not work with hubs.
Ben — Jan 26, 08 5396
See the engadget benchmarks here:
http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/24/first-benchmarks-macbook-air-is-the-slowest-apple-machine-on-th/
The Air is significantly underperformant relative to all the other portables. Its value proposition for you as a customer is clearly the form factor and design. Everything else is compromised in favor of achieving that one goal. I wouldn't waste the money on it as a dev machine.
Eric — Jan 26, 08 5399
Eric
Jesper — Jan 27, 08 5400
A relative has a 17" PowerBook - the second to last model they ever made. He bought it the day before they introduced new ones, right after driving around town repeatedly wondering why it was sold out everywhere but in one place. ;)
He's been watching carbon fiber Vaios with envy, and has asked me repeatedly if Apple had "come to its senses yet". I've sent him the link to MacBook Air. Whether I'll recommend it or not is a question of if he can cram into 80 or 64 GB of storage - MacBook Air, slow as it is, is significantly faster than the 17" PowerBook, he can afford the external SuperDrive, has never tended to plug in lots of extras, he's not using his computer heavily and has actually asked for "wireless backup".
So, for all the ones asking who this machine is for, the answer is simple: my relative.
anony moose — Jan 30, 08 5420
Travelsheep — Jul 12, 09 6830